Loom and Tella look similar on the surface. Both record your screen and camera. Both give you a shareable link when you're done. Both have a Chrome extension and a macOS desktop app.
But they're built for completely different kinds of users - and the loom vs tella comparison reveals that difference pretty quickly once you start using either tool seriously.
Tella is built for creators and marketers who want polished, visually distinctive output. Custom backgrounds, multi-layout options, a branded player. The aesthetic is the product.
Loom built its reputation as the team async tool - fast recordings, Slack integration, Atlassian tie-ins. After the Atlassian acquisition in 2023, it grew more complex. More pricing tiers, more enterprise features, and a harder path back to the simplicity it used to offer.
I built Vyds because both tools have real trade-offs that most loom vs tella comparison posts skip over. This is my attempt to be honest about all three.
TL;DR: Tella wins on visual polish for creator use cases. Loom wins on team integrations if you're deep in Atlassian tools. Vyds wins on price, data ownership, and Windows support. If you're a team looking for async communication without enterprise pricing or vendor lock-in, Vyds is worth a close look.
Table of Contents
- Loom vs Tella pricing: the full breakdown
- Loom: team async, enterprise price
- Tella: creator-first, macOS-only
- Vyds: the team-first alternative
- Free plan comparison
- Recording experience
- Editing and polish
- Platform support
- Team features
- Who wins the loom vs tella decision?
- FAQ
Loom vs Tella pricing: the full breakdown {#pricing}
Before getting into what each tool does well, the loom vs tella pricing picture is worth seeing in one table:
| Plan | Loom | Tella | Vyds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 25 videos, 5-min limit | Limited features | Unlimited clips, 5-min, no watermark |
| Paid (monthly) | $18/user/month (Business) | $26/month (Pro) | $7/month (Plus) |
| Paid (annual) | $15/user/month (Business) | $13/month (Pro) | $5/month (Plus) |
| Premium tier | $24/user/month (Business+AI) | From $19/month annual (Premium) | - |
| Team (annual) | $15/user/month | Contact sales | $9/seat/month (Pro) |
| Storage | Loom cloud | Tella cloud | Your Google Drive or OneDrive |
| Windows app | Yes | No | Yes |
Tella is cheaper than Loom on individual plans. At $13/month annual (Pro), Tella costs less than Loom Business at $15/user/month. But Loom requires the Business tier to access most features worth having. For teams, the loom vs tella comparison changes: Loom has transparent per-seat pricing; Tella requires a sales call for anything beyond individual plans.
Vyds sits below both on paid plans ($5/month annual, $7 monthly) and the free tier is the most practical of the three - no watermark, no video cap, files go into your own storage the moment you record.
Loom: team async, enterprise price {#loom}
Loom built the category. Record a screen walkthrough, drop the link in Slack, done. For teams deep in Confluence and Jira, Loom's integrations add real value that's hard to replicate elsewhere.
But the loom vs tella comparison exists because Loom's pricing shifted meaningfully after the Atlassian acquisition. The free tier got more restrictive. Features that used to be table stakes started moving behind paid plans or into higher tiers.
Today, Loom's Starter plan (their free tier) caps you at 25 total videos per workspace with a 5-minute recording limit. Downloading recordings requires the Business plan ($18/user/month). Trim requires the Business plan. For a team that records daily, the free tier runs out fast.
The Business plan at $15/user/month annual adds a lot - but for a 10-person team, that's $1,800/year. The Business+AI tier ($20/user/month annual, or roughly $240/year per person) bundles AI transcription, auto-titles, and summaries. At $2,400/year for 10 people, the math gets uncomfortable.
As one Trustpilot reviewer put it: "They charge $200 a year for basic features that are free in 95% of apps." (Leo Blocker, Oct 2025). That sentiment shows up in review after review. Downloading your own recordings - a genuinely basic feature - sits behind a $216/year paywall.
Loom best for: Teams that need Jira/Confluence integration, AI summaries, and detailed viewer analytics, with a budget that supports $15-18/user/month. If you're starting fresh, our full Loom pricing breakdown walks through exactly what you get at each tier before you commit.
Tella: creator-first, macOS-only {#tella}
Tella takes a different approach. It's less about async team communication and more about producing polished video content - product demos, marketing walkthroughs, personal brand content. Every feature decision reflects that.
Tella's recording interface lets you choose from multiple screen/camera layouts. You can set a custom background behind your camera feed, add branded lower-thirds, and switch between layouts mid-recording. The output looks edited in post-production even when you haven't touched a video editor.
For creators and marketers, that's a real differentiator. A product demo recorded in Tella looks different from one recorded in Loom or Vyds. The "Tella look" - clean layouts, custom backgrounds, polished framing - has become recognizable in SaaS product videos.
Pricing: Tella Pro runs $26/month on monthly billing, or $13/month billed annually. Tella recently added a Premium tier listed at "from $19/month" annual, which appears to add advanced branding controls and higher recording limits. Team pricing requires contacting sales - no per-seat rate is published.
Note: Tella moved from tella.tv to tella.com in 2025. The redirect is live, but it's worth knowing the domain changed if you have old bookmarks or shared links.
The most significant limitation in the loom vs tella comparison for teams: Tella has no Windows desktop app. The macOS app delivers the full experience. Windows users get a web recorder - functional for basic recording, but without the layout and design controls. For a mixed-OS team, this is a hard constraint.
Tella best for: Solo creators, marketers, and product teams on macOS who produce outward-facing content where visual polish matters. If your recordings go on landing pages, in product tours, or in marketing campaigns, Tella's layout system earns its price.
Vyds: the team-first alternative {#vyds}
I'll be direct: I built Vyds, so take this section with appropriate skepticism. The claims below are verifiable.
Vyds enters the loom vs tella comparison because neither tool handles data ownership well. Both Loom and Tella store your recordings in their cloud. Your videos are accessible as long as you're a paying customer on a live platform.
Vyds takes the opposite approach. We call it BYOS - bring your own storage. When you record with Vyds, the file goes directly to your Google Drive or OneDrive. There's no Vyds cloud in the middle. The moment you hit stop, the recording is in your own storage account.
In the loom vs tella debate, this matters more than most reviews acknowledge. Loom changed its pricing after the Atlassian acquisition. Tella changed its domain and added new paid tiers. These are normal business decisions, but each one puts your video library at risk if you don't control the files. With Vyds, your recordings live in your Google Drive whether Vyds is still a company or not.
Pricing:
- Free: Unlimited clips up to 5 minutes, no watermark, no video cap, BYOS
- Plus: $7/month ($5/month annual) - longer recordings and editing
- Pro: $12/seat/month ($9/seat/month annual) - team workspace, shared library, centralized billing
For a 10-person team, Vyds Pro runs $1,080/year. Loom Business runs $1,800/year. That's $720/year back in the budget, before accounting for the fact that your team's recordings live in their own storage rather than a vendor's cloud.
Vyds best for: Teams using screen recording for async updates, internal walkthroughs, and training materials. Also anyone who's been burned by SaaS lock-in and wants their video library in their own hands long-term. See how BYOS works for the storage details.
Free plan comparison {#free-plans}
The loom vs tella free tier question is worth its own table, because the free plan is often the entire product for people who are still evaluating:
| Free feature | Loom | Tella | Vyds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recording time limit | 5 minutes | Limited | 5 minutes |
| Video cap | 25 videos | Limited | Unlimited |
| Watermark | No | No | No |
| Download your recordings | Paid only | Paid only | Free (already in your Drive) |
| Custom backgrounds/layouts | No | Pro only | No |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| macOS desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Windows desktop app | Yes | No | Yes |
The pattern in the loom vs tella comparison at the free tier: both restrict access to your own recordings. Loom won't let you download on the free plan. Tella stores your files on their servers. In both cases, the free tier is a demo with an upgrade pressure designed in.
Vyds's free tier doesn't work that way. The recording goes to your Drive when you hit stop. No download step needed - you already have the file. For recordings under 5 minutes, you can use Vyds free forever without a credit card and your recordings will still be in your Google Drive years from now.
Recording experience {#recording}
Tella wins on aesthetics. The multi-layout recording system - different screen/camera configurations, branded backgrounds, player customization - produces a more polished result with zero post-production time. For anyone making customer-facing content, that visual quality matters and Tella delivers it better than either alternative.
Loom focuses on speed. Record, stop, share a link. The interface is deliberately minimal. For async team communication, this simplicity works. The product has added more options post-acquisition, but the core flow is still quick.
Vyds follows Loom's philosophy - speed first. Record from the Chrome extension or desktop app, stop, and the file appears in your Drive. The camera bubble is draggable, resizable, and shape-switchable between circle and square. There's no multi-layout system like Tella, but the recording flow has less friction than either competitor.
One practical point worth knowing: macOS system audio capture (getting app sounds along with your voice) used to require third-party drivers on some tools. Tella, Loom, and Vyds all handle this natively now on macOS. It's no longer a differentiator - all three just work.
Editing and polish {#editing}
The loom vs tella comparison on editing is where the core product philosophies diverge most clearly.
Tella's editor is a content creation tool. After recording, you can adjust layouts, cut awkward pauses, add text overlays, and export with consistent visual branding. If you're producing content for an audience, Tella's editor is the most capable of the three - and worth the $13/month annual price if that's your use case.
Loom's editor handles basic trim and annotation. The Business plan includes it. For $18/user/month, the editing tools are thin. Loom is good at recording and sharing; it was never designed as a content production tool. The frustration expressed in "WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY JUST TO TRIM THE VIDEO???" (Trustpilot, Aug 2025) is common in Loom reviews because the paywall sits where users expect a basic feature.
Vyds's editor handles trim and stitch - cut segments and combine multiple clips. It uses FFmpeg.wasm, so cuts process instantly in your browser without re-encoding. The trade-off: no annotation overlays yet, no shapes or callouts. Vyds is a team communication tool, not a content creation platform. If you need annotations, ScreenPal at $4/month annual is worth a look. For a broader comparison, see our screen recording tools for teams roundup.
Platform support {#platform}
| Platform | Loom | Tella | Vyds |
|---|---|---|---|
| macOS app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Windows app | Yes | No | Yes |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Web recorder | Yes | Yes | No |
| iOS / Android | No | No | No |
Platform support is where the loom vs tella comparison becomes straightforward for many teams. Tella has no Windows desktop app. If your team includes Windows users, Tella's full recording and layout experience isn't available to them. The web recorder covers basic recording but doesn't have Tella's layout and design controls.
Loom and Vyds both support Windows natively. For any team with Windows machines, this is a real constraint on the loom vs tella choice - not a minor footnote.
Team features {#teams}
| Team feature | Loom Business ($15/user annual) | Tella (Contact sales) | Vyds Pro ($9/seat annual) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Team folders | Yes | Yes (team plan) | Yes |
| Centralized billing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Viewer analytics | Yes | Basic | Basic |
| AI summaries | Business+AI tier ($20/user) | No | No |
| Transparent per-seat price | Yes ($15/user/mo) | No | Yes ($9/seat/mo) |
For a 10-person team on annual billing:
- Loom Business: $1,800/year
- Tella team: Contact sales (no published rate)
- Vyds Pro: $1,080/year
The loom vs tella team comparison comes down to feature depth vs. price transparency. Loom has the deeper feature set for enterprise teams - analytics, AI summaries, Atlassian integration. Tella doesn't publish team pricing, which typically signals a price that's higher than a flat per-seat rate would be.
Vyds Pro at $9/seat/month annual offers shared workspace, team folders, and centralized billing at a predictable price - and each team member's recordings go into their own Google Drive or OneDrive, not a shared vendor cloud. For a 5-person team, that's $540/year vs. $900 for Loom.
For more on team-focused comparisons, see our full Loom alternatives roundup.
Who wins the loom vs tella decision? {#verdict}
The loom vs tella answer depends on what you're recording and who it's for.
Tella wins if you're a creator or marketer producing polished, outward-facing content on macOS. The layout system, custom backgrounds, and branded player are the best in this comparison. For content that goes on landing pages, in marketing campaigns, or in customer-facing demos, Tella earns its price. The loom vs tella comparison for creator use cases is Tella's to lose.
Loom wins if you're deep in Atlassian tools and need AI summaries, viewer analytics, and Jira/Confluence integration. The depth is real for enterprise teams. If you're evaluating fresh - meaning no existing Atlassian investment - the price is harder to justify. Our is-Loom-worth-it analysis goes deeper on that calculus.
Vyds wins if you want async team communication at a lower price point, need consistent Windows support, or care about keeping recordings in your own storage rather than a vendor's cloud. The loom vs tella comparison often skips past data ownership entirely - Vyds makes it the core product proposition.
One clear thing from the loom vs tella comparison: Windows teams should rule out Tella for consistent team adoption unless they're comfortable with web-only recording on Windows. That's a structural limitation, not a gap they're likely to close soon.
For anyone frustrated by tools that add pricing tiers and enterprise complexity as they grow - the Atlassian acquisition of Loom being the most visible recent example - BYOS is a structural answer to that problem. Your videos live in your Google Drive. Not in ours, not in Loom's, not in Tella's. See how BYOS works and what that means for your recording library long-term.
FAQ {#faq}
Is Tella better than Loom?
For creator use cases on macOS, yes. Tella's visual controls - custom backgrounds, multi-layout recording, branded player - produce more polished output with no post-editing required. For team async communication or Windows users, Loom is more practical. The loom vs tella answer depends on whether you're producing content for an audience or communicating with teammates.
Is Tella free?
Tella has a free plan with limited features. Pro runs $26/month or $13/month billed annually. A newer Premium tier is listed starting from $19/month annual and adds advanced branding features. Team pricing requires contacting sales.
What's the core difference between Loom and Tella?
Loom is built for team async communication - fast recording, Slack/Atlassian integration, viewer analytics. Tella is built for creator content - polished layouts, custom backgrounds, branded video output. Both store recordings in their own cloud. The biggest practical difference for teams: Tella doesn't have a Windows desktop app.
Does Tella work on Windows?
Tella's desktop app is macOS-only. Windows users can use Tella's web recorder, but it lacks the full layout and design controls available on macOS. For a consistent Mac and Windows experience, Loom or Vyds are the better options.
What happens to my Loom videos if I cancel?
Loom gives you a window to export recordings after cancellation, but your library lives on Loom's servers while you're a customer. With Vyds, recordings go directly into your Google Drive or OneDrive from the moment you record - there's nothing to export because you already have the files.
How does Vyds compare to Loom vs Tella on pricing?
At $5/month annual (Plus) or $9/seat/month annual (Pro), Vyds is cheaper than both Loom Business ($15/user/month) and Tella Pro ($13/month). Vyds also has transparent team pricing, where Tella requires a sales call for team plans. The other difference: Vyds stores recordings in your own Google Drive or OneDrive rather than a vendor cloud.
Is the loom vs tella comparison relevant for remote teams?
Yes, with one major caveat: if your team includes Windows users, the loom vs tella comparison is largely settled - Tella's desktop experience is macOS-only. For remote teams with mixed OS setups, Loom or Vyds cover all platforms. For team-specific screen recording options, see our screen recording tools for teams guide.
Which is better for recording product demos - Loom or Tella?
Tella, by a clear margin. The ability to set custom backgrounds, choose layouts, and produce a polished-looking result without editing makes Tella the better choice for customer-facing demos. Loom's strength is internal async communication, not visual content production. For demos where the recording is the deliverable itself, Tella is the right call - assuming you're on macOS.
Related posts
- 7 Best Loom Alternatives in 2026 - Full list with pricing and honest assessments
- Is Loom Worth It in 2026? - Detailed breakdown of what you actually get at each Loom tier
- Loom Pricing 2026: What You Actually Pay - The full numbers at each tier with team cost math
- Loom vs ScreenPal vs Vyds - The three-way comparison for budget-conscious users
- Screen Recording Tools for Teams - Async video options for distributed teams
Your videos live in your Google Drive - not in a vendor's cloud. If we shut down tomorrow, you'd still have every recording. See how BYOS works.
Ready to try Vyds?
Free screen recording with no watermarks. Launching soon for macOS, Windows, and Chrome.
Get early access