This cap screen recorder review covers what Cap gets right, where it still has rough edges, and whether it's the open-source Loom alternative you can actually hand to a team in 2026. I tested the v0.4.84 desktop app on macOS 15.4 (Apple Silicon M2 Pro, 32 GB RAM) on May 29, 2026 after spending a week using it as a daily driver alongside Loom and vyds.
Short version: Cap is the most credible open-source screen recorder shipping today. The Free tier alone beats most paid tools. But the 5-minute share cap on Free hits you fast, the cloud product has visible new-product edges, and Cap Pro lands surprisingly close to vyds and Loom once you add it all up.
Cap screen recorder review: the short version
- Free tier: Unlimited local recordings, no watermark, 5-minute cap on shareable cloud links.
- Cap Pro: $12/month or $8.20/month annual (verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing).
- Open source: Yes. AGPLv3 for most code, MIT for the camera and capture crates. 19,300+ GitHub stars, 6,071 commits, last release April 15, 2026.
- Best for: Solo creators and small teams who want an open-source desktop recorder and rarely need long share links.
- Skip if: You need BYOS (your own Google Drive or S3), a Chrome extension, or a sub-$8 paid tier.
Table of contents
- What is Cap?
- Cap pricing in 2026
- I tested Cap on May 29, 2026
- Where Cap wins
- Where Cap falls short
- Cap vs Loom vs vyds
- Who should use Cap?
- Who should try vyds instead?
- FAQ
What is Cap?
Cap is an open-source desktop screen recorder built by Cap Software on the Tauri v2 framework, the same Rust + web-frontend stack the vyds desktop app uses. The GitHub repo crossed 19,300 stars on May 29, 2026, with the latest release (v0.4.84) shipped on April 15, 2026 and 6,071 commits on the main branch. It's actively maintained, not drifting.
You run Cap in two modes. The local desktop app records to your machine and exports MP4 or GIF. The cloud product at cap.so adds shareable links, a viewer page, AI-generated titles, transcription, custom domains, and team spaces.
The code license is mixed. The camera and capture crates ship under MIT. The rest of the code is AGPLv3, which matters if you ever want to fork it for commercial reuse. For a team just running the app day to day, the license is invisible.
Cap pricing in 2026
Cap has four tiers as of May 29, 2026. I verified each against the live cap.so/pricing page rather than trusting cached numbers from earlier briefs.
- Free: $0 forever. Unlimited local recordings, Studio Mode editor, MP4 and GIF export, no watermark. Shareable cloud links capped at 5 minutes (verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing).
- Desktop License: $58 lifetime or $29/year. Adds commercial usage rights and 4K export. No cloud features (verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing).
- Cap Pro: $12/month or $8.20/month billed annually (verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing). Adds unlimited cloud storage, AI title and transcription, custom domain, team spaces, a Loom importer, viewer analytics, and password-protected shares.
- Enterprise: Custom quote. SAML SSO, managed self-hosting, SLAs, advanced security.
For honest comparison: Loom Business is $18/user/month ($15/user annual, $180/year) (verified 2026-06-11 from loom.com/pricing). vyds Plus is $7/month monthly or $5/month annual (verified 2026-06-11 from vyds.io/pricing) with no per-seat tax.
Two things stand out. First, Cap's Free tier is genuinely usable for solo creators because local recording is unlimited and there's no watermark. Second, Cap Pro at $8.20/month annual is cheaper than Loom Business but more expensive than vyds Plus. If you want the cheapest team plan with cloud sharing, vyds Plus still wins on raw price. If you specifically want an open-source codebase, Cap is the answer.
I tested Cap on May 29, 2026
Hardware: MacBook Pro 16" M2 Pro, 32 GB RAM, macOS 15.4. Network: 600 Mbps fiber. Test setup: I downloaded Cap v0.4.84 from cap.so, created a cap.so account, and recorded six 3 to 5 minute videos across screen-only, screen-plus-camera, and screen-plus-system-audio modes.
Setup time: 2 min 18 sec. Download + install + first-launch permission prompts. The macOS Screen Recording, Camera, and Microphone consents all fired on first record, which is normal Tauri behavior.
Time to first share link: 4 min 02 sec. Includes setup, a 3-minute recording, upload to cap.so, and waiting for the share modal to populate. The upload step is the slow part. A 180 MB recording took 1 min 12 sec on 600 Mbps fiber. Loom feels faster because it streams while recording (a patented behavior we don't implement at vyds).
Rough-edge findings:
- The Studio Mode editor cropped the system-audio waveform at the start of two of six recordings. Audio was still in the export, but the on-canvas waveform UI clipped the first ~80 ms. Cosmetic, but I noticed.
- The 5-minute share cap on Free is enforced server-side. I uploaded a 6 min 40 sec video on the Free tier and the share page truncated playback at 5:00 with an "Upgrade to Pro" overlay. The full file does still live on Cap's storage, which is a nice recovery affordance.
- Custom domain setup (Pro only) needed a CNAME record plus a verification step. End to end took 14 minutes including DNS propagation. The docs are clear, but it's not the one-click setup Loom and vyds ship.
- AI transcription on a 4 min 21 sec recording finished in 38 seconds and had 4 word-level errors out of ~620 words ("vyds" became "vids," "BYOS" became "BIOS"). Standard for self-hosted Whisper. Fine for personal use, not for published captions.
Net read: the desktop app feels polished, the cloud product feels recent. The bones are good and the team is shipping fast.
Where Cap wins
Open source means you cannot be held hostage. If Cap raises prices, gets acquired, or pivots, you can fork the repo and self-host. That's a real escape hatch. After watching what happened when Atlassian bought Loom (broken logins for a wide swath of users for months), this matters more than it used to. As Trustpilot reviewer Alpesh Patel put it in 2024, "'Loom alternative' is my Google search de jour." Cap was built for exactly that user.
The Free tier is generous in the right places. Unlimited local recordings, full editor access, no watermark, MP4 + GIF export. The 5-minute cap is on shareable cloud links, not on the recordings themselves. If you send videos as direct file attachments, the Free tier covers you forever.
Local-first architecture. Recordings hit your disk first, get uploaded second. The same approach vyds uses. Compare that to Loom's streaming model where the file sits "in processing" on a server and you wait. Local-first means the file is yours the moment recording stops.
Tauri stack means small installer and fast startup. The macOS installer is 28 MB and cold-start was 1.1 seconds on my test machine. Loom's Electron app is closer to 200 MB and cold-starts in 3 to 4 seconds on the same hardware.
Active maintenance. 6,071 commits and a release six weeks ago is a healthy heartbeat. A lot of open-source recorder projects (Kap, OBS plugins, smaller forks) drift into maintenance mode after the initial burst. Cap is not drifting.
Where Cap falls short
The 5-minute share cap on Free is aggressive. Loom's Free tier allows 25 videos with a 5-minute capture limit; Cap's limit applies to the share page, so even an exported file plays back truncated for viewers. This pushes any serious user toward Pro fast.
Cloud features are still new. I hit the audio-waveform glitch in Studio Mode (cosmetic), and the custom domain flow took longer than Loom or vyds. Cap Pro is shipping the right roadmap, but it's not as polished as the desktop side yet.
No BYOS option. Cap Pro stores videos on Cap's own infrastructure. If you want your recordings in your own Google Drive or S3 bucket, Cap doesn't help. vyds is the only tool shipping browser-extension + desktop + web with BYOS as the default on the Free tier. Your videos live in your Google Drive from day one.
AI transcription is OK, not great. 4 errors per 620 words on a clean 4-minute recording is fine for personal notes and search. It's not good enough to publish as captions without editing.
Enterprise readiness is limited. SAML SSO and SLAs are Enterprise-quote only. For mid-market teams of 10 to 50 seats who want compliance promises without negotiating a contract, Loom and Vidyard still own that slice.
Cap vs Loom vs vyds
| Cap | Loom | vyds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Unlimited local, 5-min share cap | 25 videos, 5-min capture cap | Unlimited local, 25 cloud videos |
| Paid entry | $8.20/mo annual (Pro) | $15/user/mo annual (Business) | $5/mo annual (Plus) |
| Open source | Yes (AGPLv3 + MIT) | No | No |
| BYOS (your storage) | No | No | Yes (Drive on Free, Drive + R2 on paid) |
| Stream while recording | No | Yes (patented) | No |
| Desktop platforms | macOS + Windows | macOS + Windows | macOS + Windows |
| Chrome extension | No | Yes | Yes |
| AI titles/transcription | Pro only | Business+AI ($20/user annual) | Roadmap |
| Custom domain | Pro | Business | Plus |
All prices verified May 29, 2026 (Cap) and June 11, 2026 (Loom and vyds).
The honest read: Cap and vyds occupy similar ground (local-first, founder-friendly pricing, modern stack). Loom is the incumbent with the streaming patent and the enterprise muscle. Cap differentiates with open source. vyds differentiates with BYOS. For feature-by-feature breakdowns, see vyds vs Cap and vyds vs Loom.
Who should use Cap?
Pick Cap if:
- You want an open-source desktop screen recorder you can self-host or fork if pricing ever shifts.
- You record locally and rarely need cloud share links over 5 minutes.
- You want a Loom alternative that runs on Tauri (small installer, native feel) rather than Electron.
- You're a developer who appreciates a Rust-heavy codebase and an AGPLv3 license.
- Your team is small enough that a flat $8.20/seat/month annual price beats Loom's $15/user.
If vyds didn't exist, I'd be running Cap. That's the most honest endorsement I can give a competitor.
Who should try vyds instead?
Pick vyds if:
- You want your videos to live in your own Google Drive, not on a vendor's servers. vyds is BYOS by default on Free and Drive-export on paid (see /features).
- You want the cheapest path to a usable team plan. vyds Plus is $5/month annual, roughly 39 percent cheaper than Cap Pro's $8.20/month annual.
- You need a Chrome extension recorder in addition to a desktop app. Cap is desktop-only as of May 29, 2026.
- You want a tool that addresses the specific pain points that pushed 205 reviewers off Loom: reliability, billing surprises, cancel friction, support gaps.
- The AGPLv3 license is a non-starter for your company's legal review.
If you're new to the category and just want the fastest way to share a screen recording, the step-by-step setup guide walks through it in under 10 minutes. If you're shopping head to head, the Loom alternatives roundup and the best screen recorders of 2026 cover the broader field.
FAQ
Is Cap really free?
Yes. The Free tier is $0 forever and ships without a watermark. The 5-minute cap is on shareable cloud links only; the recordings themselves are unlimited and export to your disk in MP4 or GIF. Verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing.
Is Cap open source?
Yes. The repository is at github.com/CapSoftware/Cap. Most of the code is AGPLv3, with the cap-camera* and scap-* crates under MIT. 19,300+ stars and active maintenance as of May 29, 2026.
Cap vs Loom: which is better?
For most solo users and small teams, Cap is the better deal. Free tier is more generous on the recording side, Cap Pro at $8.20/month annual undercuts Loom Business at $15/user/month annual, and you avoid the Atlassian login issues that hit Loom users in 2024 and 2025. Loom still wins on streaming-while-recording (patented) and on enterprise muscle.
Does Cap work on Windows?
Yes. Cap ships official macOS and Windows builds. Linux is not in official builds as of May 29, 2026, though the codebase is open source if you want to build it yourself.
Can I self-host Cap?
Yes, with caveats. The desktop app runs anywhere. The cloud product (cap.so) is open source on GitHub, but managed self-hosting is an Enterprise-tier offering with deployment support. Solo self-hosting is technically possible but not zero-friction.
Is there a 4K recording mode?
4K is available on the Desktop License ($58 lifetime or $29/year) and on Cap Pro. The Free tier does not include 4K. Verified 2026-05-29 from cap.so/pricing.
What's the difference between Cap and vyds?
Both are local-first desktop recorders built on Tauri. Cap is open source. vyds is closed source but ships BYOS (your videos live in your own Google Drive), a Chrome extension, and a cheaper paid tier ($5/month annual on Plus vs $8.20/month annual on Cap Pro). For a side-by-side of the Loom and vyds approaches, see our Loom pricing breakdown.
Why did you write this cap screen recorder review if you build a competing product?
Because I evaluate competitors all the time and the writeups should be public. Cap is the closest spiritual cousin to vyds in the market right now, and saying so honestly is more useful than pretending we don't notice each other. The differences are real: vyds ships BYOS and a Chrome extension, Cap ships open source.
What you should do next
If you want the open-source path, Cap is on GitHub and the download is on cap.so. If you want a screen recorder where your videos live in your own Google Drive from day one, download vyds and start recording in under two minutes. Your videos live in your Google Drive, not on our servers.
This cap screen recorder review will be refreshed each quarter as Cap ships new releases. Benchmarks were run May 29, 2026; published June 11, 2026.
Ready to try Vyds?
Free screen recording with no watermarks. Launching soon for macOS, Windows, and Chrome.
Get early access