TL;DR: In the loom vs kommodo decision, Loom wins on polish, enterprise readiness, and product integrations after the Atlassian acquisition. Kommodo wins on free tier generosity (1-hour free recordings vs Loom's 5-minute cap), price ($9/user/month annual vs $15), and its standout trick: AI that turns your recording into a written step-by-step SOP. If you want the recording AND the documentation, Kommodo is doing something Loom does not. If you want the most battle-tested async video tool and budget is not the constraint, Loom is still the default. Both store your videos on their servers, which is where a third option comes in at the end.
Table of contents
- What each tool is
- Loom vs Kommodo pricing
- Free tier comparison
- Where Loom wins
- Where Kommodo wins
- Feature table
- Which one fits your use case
- Considering a third option?
- FAQ
What each tool is
Loom is the screen recorder most teams have already heard of: record your screen and camera, get a share link the moment you stop, drop it in Slack. Atlassian acquired Loom in late 2023, and it now sits inside the Atlassian product family alongside Jira and Confluence. That acquisition brought enterprise muscle and deeper integrations, and also a wave of login migration complaints from long-time users.
Kommodo (rebranded from Komodo Decks) has been around since 2018 and broke out through a 6,000-license AppSumo launch in 2023. It records your screen like Loom does, but its core differentiator is what happens after you stop: AI generates a written step-by-step guide (an SOP) from the recording, complete with screenshots. The pitch is "record once, get a video AND a document." It claims 100,000+ users and ships on more platforms than Loom: macOS, Windows, Chrome, iOS, and Android.
The two tools overlap on the recording basics and diverge hard on output. Loom's output is a video with a transcript. Kommodo's output is a video plus an auto-written process document.
Loom vs Kommodo pricing
Pricing is where the loom vs kommodo comparison gets concrete. Real numbers, both verified against the live pricing pages (loom.com/pricing and kommodo.ai/pricing).
| Plan | Loom | Kommodo |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Starter) | $0 (Starter) |
| Paid, billed annually | $15/user/month, $180/year (Business) | $9/user/month, $108/year (Premium) |
| Paid, billed monthly | $18/user/month | $15/month |
| AI tier | Business+AI $20/user/month annual | AI transcription included from Free |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Premium covers it (no separate tier listed) |
Loom prices verified 2026-06-11 from loom.com/pricing. Kommodo prices verified 2026-05-26 from kommodo.ai/pricing and corroborated 2026-06-11.
Two things stand out. First, Kommodo Premium annual is 40 percent cheaper than Loom Business annual ($108 vs $180 per user per year). Second, Loom charges extra for AI features (Business+AI at $20/user/month annual), while Kommodo includes AI transcription on every tier including Free. If AI summaries and transcription are the point, the price gap widens further.
For a 10-person team, the annual math: Loom Business runs $1,800/year, Loom Business+AI runs $2,400/year, Kommodo Premium runs $1,080/year. When we checked kommodo.ai on May 26, 2026, the Premium annual plan was listed as covering unlimited users, which would make the team math even more lopsided if it holds for your team size. Confirm that detail on their pricing page before you buy, because it is an unusual model and unusual models change.
Free tier comparison
This is the starkest difference in the loom vs kommodo matchup, and for solo users it may be the whole decision.
| Free tier limit | Loom Starter | Kommodo Starter |
|---|---|---|
| Recording length cap | 5 minutes per video | Up to 1 hour per video |
| Video count | 25 videos total | 1 user, instant link sharing |
| AI transcription | No (paid tier) | Included |
| Watermark | No | No |
Loom's free tier is an evaluation tier: 25 videos with a 5-minute cap (verified 2026-06-11 from loom.com/pricing). It exists so you can test the workflow before paying. A real user hits the wall in the first week. As one Trustpilot reviewer, Tanky Blitz, put it: "WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY JUST TO TRIM THE VIDEO???"
Kommodo's free tier allows recordings up to an hour long with AI transcription included. For a solo user who records occasional walkthroughs, Kommodo's free tier might be all they ever need. That is rare in this category, and worth saying plainly: Kommodo has the most generous free recording length of any mainstream Loom alternative we have evaluated.
Where Loom wins
Polish and reliability of the core loop. Loom's record-stop-share loop is the smoothest in the category. The link is on your clipboard the moment you stop recording, backed by a patented stream-while-recording architecture that nobody else legally replicates.
Enterprise checkboxes. SSO, admin controls, retention policies, and the Atlassian compliance umbrella. If your IT team needs a vendor security review to pass, Loom has the paperwork ready.
Integrations. Loom embeds rendered players in Slack, Notion, Jira, Confluence, and GitHub. Kommodo has a Chrome extension and a Google Workspace sidebar, but Loom's embed coverage is broader.
Brand trust at the buying stage. "Send me a Loom" is a verb now. When you share a Loom link with a client, nobody asks what it is. Kommodo links may get a "what's this?" from cautious recipients.
Where Kommodo wins
The auto-SOP output. This is Kommodo's real differentiator. Record a 10-minute process walkthrough and Kommodo's AI writes the numbered step-by-step document with screenshots while the video uploads. For onboarding docs, support runbooks, and process documentation, that second artifact is the thing teams actually needed the video for. Loom gives you a transcript; Kommodo gives you a document a new hire can follow without watching anything.
Price. $9/user/month annual vs $15. Same job, 40 percent less.
Free tier. One hour vs five minutes per recording. Not close.
Platform coverage. iOS and Android apps alongside macOS, Windows, and Chrome. Loom has mobile apps too, but Kommodo's mobile recording feeds the same SOP pipeline.
AI included everywhere. Transcription from the free tier up, no separate AI tier to buy.
One honest caveat on Kommodo: it is a smaller company than Atlassian by orders of magnitude. The flip side of the AppSumo growth story (6,000 lifetime licenses sold in a day in 2023) is a large base of lifetime-deal users who paid once, which is a revenue model that has strained other tools in this space. That is not a prediction, just a thing to know when you are betting your team's video library on a vendor.
Feature table
| Feature | Loom | Kommodo |
|---|---|---|
| Screen + camera recording | Yes | Yes |
| System audio capture | Yes | Yes |
| Instant share link | Yes (fastest in category) | Yes |
| AI transcription | Business+AI tier | All tiers, including Free |
| Auto-generated SOPs / step docs | No | Yes, core feature |
| Knowledge base for recordings | Workspace library | SOP storage built in |
| Mobile apps | iOS + Android | iOS + Android |
| Google Workspace sidebar | No | Yes |
| Branded landing pages | Business tier | Premium tier |
| Viewer analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Storage location | Loom's servers | Kommodo's cloud |
| Bring your own storage | No | No |
| Free recording length | 5 minutes | Up to 1 hour |
Which one fits your use case
Most loom vs kommodo writeups stop at the feature table. The more useful question is what you are recording and who consumes it, because the two tools are optimized for different consumption: Loom for watching, Kommodo for reading what the AI wrote from the watching.
Pick Loom if:
- Your company already lives in Atlassian products and the integration matters
- You need enterprise compliance paperwork to pass procurement
- The person you send videos to should never have to wonder what the link is
- Budget tolerance covers $180/user/year and the polish is worth it to you
Pick Kommodo if:
- You record processes and the written SOP is half the reason you are recording
- Free tier headroom matters: 1-hour recordings without paying beats every competitor
- You want AI transcription without buying a separate AI tier
- $108/user/year fits the budget where $180 does not
Pick neither if the thing you actually care about is owning the video files. Both tools store recordings on their own servers, under their own terms. If the vendor has a bad quarter, changes pricing, or sunsets a tier, your video library is a hostage in the negotiation. Loom users learned this during the Atlassian login migration. As Trustpilot reviewer Dmitrii put it: "Everything was great until Loom switched to Atlassian's login system."
Considering a third option?
This is the part where we talk about our own tool, so calibrate accordingly: vyds is a screen recorder built around one idea neither Loom nor Kommodo offers. Your recordings save to storage you own.
On the vyds free tier, recordings land in your own Google Drive or OneDrive. Not a copy. The actual file, in your storage, from the first recording. If vyds disappeared tomorrow, every video you ever made is still sitting in your Drive folder. Neither Loom nor Kommodo can say that; see the feature breakdown for how BYOS works.
The pricing is also simpler than both: vyds Plus is $7/month, or $5/month billed annually (verified 2026-06-11 from vyds.io/pricing), with no per-seat tax until you actually want team features ($12/seat/month Pro, $9 annual). For the 10-person team above, that is $600/year on Pro annual vs $1,080 (Kommodo) or $1,800 (Loom Business).
What vyds does not do: auto-generated SOPs (Kommodo's trick) or stream-while-recording instant links (Loom's patented trick; our link is ready a few seconds after you stop instead). If those are your deciding features, the honest answer is to pick the tool above that does them. If owning your recordings and not paying a seat tax are the deciding features, download vyds and the free tier will tell you in five minutes whether the workflow fits.
For deeper side-by-sides: vyds vs Loom and vyds vs Kommodo.
FAQ
Is Kommodo cheaper than Loom?
Yes. The loom vs kommodo price gap is 40 percent on annual billing: Kommodo Premium is $9/user/month billed annually ($108/year) vs Loom Business at $15/user/month annual ($180/year). On monthly billing it is $15 vs $18. Kommodo also includes AI transcription on all tiers, while Loom charges $20/user/month annual for Business+AI. Prices verified June 2026.
What does Kommodo do that Loom does not?
Auto-generated SOPs. Kommodo's AI converts a screen recording into a written step-by-step document with screenshots. Loom produces a transcript, but not a structured process document. Kommodo also allows recordings up to 1 hour on its free tier, against Loom's 5-minute free cap.
Is Kommodo the same as Komodo Decks?
Yes. The product launched as Komodo Decks in 2018 and rebranded to Kommodo. Same company, founded by Khanan Grauer and Harry Brodsky. If you see old reviews referencing Komodo Decks, they are about the same tool.
Did Atlassian buying Loom change anything?
The acquisition closed in late 2023. The product kept its pace, but the forced migration to Atlassian's login system generated a documented wave of complaints from long-time users locked out of their accounts. It also moved Loom up-market: enterprise features got priority, and the free tier stayed capped at 5 minutes.
Which is better for making training documentation?
Kommodo, and it is not close. The auto-SOP output is purpose-built for training docs: record the process once, get the video and the written guide. With Loom you would record, then write the document yourself from the transcript. If documentation is the primary output and the video is secondary, this single feature settles the loom vs kommodo question by itself.
Do either of them let me keep recordings in my own storage?
No. Both Loom and Kommodo store recordings on their own infrastructure. If you want recordings saved to your own Google Drive or OneDrive automatically, that is the specific problem vyds was built around, and it works that way on the free tier.
Ready to try Vyds?
Free screen recording with no watermarks. Launching soon for macOS, Windows, and Chrome.
Get early access